A Lovestory of "Near-Misses" Which is Right on Target: 'Normal People' by Sally Rooney

Two teenagers in a small Irish town fall into something they can't quite name, can't quite hold onto, and can't quite let go of, and somehow that's enough to build one of the most quietly devastating love stories of the last decade.

Sally Rooney's second novel, 'Normal People' (2018), follows Connell and Marianne from their final year of secondary school in Carricklea through university at Trinity College Dublin and beyond. At school, the dynamic is brutally clear: Connell is popular, easy, well-liked; Marianne is an outsider, prickly and friendless, though privately far wealthier than Connell, his mother cleans her family's house. Their connection starts in secret, shaped by that social imbalance, and by the time they reach Trinity the power has flipped entirely: Marianne finds her people, her confidence, her place, while Connell, unmoored from the world that made sense to him, struggles to find his footing. Over years, they drift toward each other and away again, sleeping with other people, misreading each other's silences, never quite managing to say the thing that would fix everything.

Rooney was still in her twenties when she wrote this, and by then she'd already made her name as a formidable debater at Trinity, European debating champion, in fact, which maybe explains why her characters talk in such precise, devastating circles around the things they actually mean. Born in County Mayo and raised in an arts-and-books household (her mother ran a community arts centre), she wrote much of 'Normal People' in her mid-twenties, and the novel went on to win the Costa Novel Award, get longlisted for the Booker Prize, and eventually become the Hulu/BBC series that turned Paul Mescal's chain into a genuine cultural moment. It's easy to forget, amid all that, how small and specific the book actually is: two people, one town, one relationship, examined from every conceivable angle.

What makes Rooney's style so distinctive here is what she leaves out. No quotation marks anywhere in the novel, dialogue just slides into the prose, unadorned, so conversations feel both more intimate and more slippery, like you're reading someone's memory of a conversation rather than the conversation itself. She also refuses interiority in the traditional sense: we're told what Connell and Marianne do and say, rarely what they're feeling, which means the reader is constantly doing the emotional labour of interpretation that the characters themselves can't quite manage. It's a genuinely radical choice for a book this emotionally saturated, and it's why the silences between the dialogue often hit harder than the dialogue itself.

Thematically, this is a novel obsessed with power; who has it, who's pretending not to, and how quickly it can shift depending on which room you're standing in. Class runs through everything, as does the specifically millennial anxiety of trying to build an identity in a world that keeps changing the rules on you. But underneath the politics, this is really a book about communication failure as a form of love, two people who understand each other more completely than anyone else in their lives, and who still, somehow, cannot manage to just say what they mean at the moment it matters.

Emotionally, 'Normal People' works by attrition rather than dramatic incident, there's no single explosive scene, just a slow accumulation of near-misses and almost-conversations that leave you wrung out by the final page in a way you can't quite explain to anyone who hasn't read it. It's not a comfortable read, but it's an achingly precise one, a novel that understands, better than almost anything else published this decade, how much unsaid feeling can live inside two people who are, ostensibly, just talking.

View on Amazon